Clinical Advisory Board
A chair for every specialty. A peer-to-peer for every complex case.
Specialty care is too high-stakes to leave to a single prescriber and a faxed prior authorization. The Quantify Clinical Advisory Board — a standing panel of board-certified physicians across oncology, neurology, gastroenterology, and rheumatology, paired with senior clinical nurses — reviews complex cases for medical appropriateness, evidence-based protocol fit, and patient safety. We don't just check whether the treatment can be billed. We check whether it's the right treatment.
What the board reviews
- Complex oncology, autoimmune, rare-disease, and high-cost specialty cases
- Treatment protocols proposed by the prescribing physician — against current evidence and patient-specific factors
- Prior authorization decisions where the plan or PBM denial may be clinically wrong
- Drug-drug interactions, contraindications, and physiologic risk profiles
- Cases where a less invasive, equally effective therapy may be the better choice
Who sits on the board
- Alberto Montero, MD — Chair. Board-certified medical oncology.
- Specialty physician advisors across neurology, gastroenterology, and rheumatology
- Senior clinical RNs with infusion, oncology, and complex-care experience
- Carl Black, PharmD — Chief Pharmacy Officer, voting member on dispensing and REMS questions
- Liane Parker, RN, CPHM — Co-Founder & COO, ensures board decisions reach the bedside
Chair, Clinical Advisory Board
A recent peer-to-peer clinical intervention
A patient was scheduled to start systemic chemotherapy. Dr. Montero reviewed the case, pulled the pathology, staging, and recent imaging together, and identified that a less invasive, evidence-supported therapy was both safer for this patient's comorbidity profile and clinically superior given the actual tumor characteristics. The treatment plan was changed before the first cycle started. The patient avoided unnecessary toxicity, the plan avoided the cost of a wrong-protocol regimen, and the outcome was better — not because we moved faster, but because a physician actually looked at the chart.
This is the difference between specialty care that processes and specialty care that practices medicine.